<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eee PC 1000H vs 1000 SSD Version (HDD vs Asus SSD)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exoid.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exoid.com/?p=231</link>
	<description>The bleeding edge of technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:01:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: edo</title>
		<link>http://www.exoid.com/?p=231&#038;cpage=1#comment-133004</link>
		<dc:creator>edo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exoid.com/?p=231#comment-133004</guid>
		<description>in Asus 1000 SSD it&#039;s important that you install WinXP on 8GB Partition  or 32GB one. which one you used? 8GB one is faster if you don&#039;t know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in Asus 1000 SSD it&#8217;s important that you install WinXP on 8GB Partition  or 32GB one. which one you used? 8GB one is faster if you don&#8217;t know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.exoid.com/?p=231&#038;cpage=1#comment-129181</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exoid.com/?p=231#comment-129181</guid>
		<description>The SSD version may be a bit slower (the one I have), but the battery life definitely outweighs the slight decrease in performance when compared to the 1000H. I have been able to squeeze over 9hrs on a single charge in XP. From what I&#039;ve read, 1000H get about 5.5 - 6hrs. I bought it for school and taking notes in class. I have a desktop when I need performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SSD version may be a bit slower (the one I have), but the battery life definitely outweighs the slight decrease in performance when compared to the 1000H. I have been able to squeeze over 9hrs on a single charge in XP. From what I&#8217;ve read, 1000H get about 5.5 &#8211; 6hrs. I bought it for school and taking notes in class. I have a desktop when I need performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian t</title>
		<link>http://www.exoid.com/?p=231&#038;cpage=1#comment-122830</link>
		<dc:creator>brian t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exoid.com/?p=231#comment-122830</guid>
		<description>The 1000H with XP is $100 cheaper? Not the case here in Europe. That&#039;s not what I remembered, and I just checked a UK supplier who has it for £20 (&lt; $40) less than the Linux version w/ 40GB SSD, which I got. 

Not regretting it after seeing your video - the benefits of the SSD outweigh the disadvantages for me. One trick for using SSD with XP is: NO Swapfile. Not even with 1GB RAM - get more RAM if it&#039;s a problem. If you use one, XP will use it, even if it doesn&#039;t need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1000H with XP is $100 cheaper? Not the case here in Europe. That&#8217;s not what I remembered, and I just checked a UK supplier who has it for £20 (&lt; $40) less than the Linux version w/ 40GB SSD, which I got. </p>
<p>Not regretting it after seeing your video &#8211; the benefits of the SSD outweigh the disadvantages for me. One trick for using SSD with XP is: NO Swapfile. Not even with 1GB RAM &#8211; get more RAM if it&#8217;s a problem. If you use one, XP will use it, even if it doesn&#8217;t need to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
